Ilovebenefits’s Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Individual Mandate – Legal Considerations

Heritage Foundation just released a landmark legal analysis of the constitutional issues around an individual mandate. Written by Randy Barnett, Nathaniel Stewart and Todd Gaziano, the analysis argues that a personal mandate is both “unprecedented and inconstitutional.”

The paper argues that Congress has never – ever – tried to do something like this. Not even in times of war when national survival was a stake did it force farmers to grow food for the troops or workers to build tanks. “And what Congress cannot do during wartime, with national survival at stake, it cannot do in peacetime simply to avoid the political cost of raising taxes to pay for desired government programs.”

It accuses members of Congress of a breach in their duty “to determine the constitutionality of legislation independently of how the Supreme Court has ruled or may rule in the future.” It is not enough to pass laws willy-nilly just because they think it would be a swell idea. This is still a government of limited and enumerated powers, and forcing people to buy something they don’t wish to buy ain’t one of those powers.

SOURCE:

Heritage Foundation

Advertisements

December 11, 2009 - Posted by | Federal Government, healthcare | , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: